Expect a 30 to 50 percent reduction in time spent on admin-heavy tasks like formatting, form-filling, and data collation.

Yes. Templates are aligned with current NHMRC and MRFF criteria and updated automatically when funding rules change.

Forms use your approved templates. Fields are auto-filled but remain editable for compliance and final review.

Data is processed in secure, compliant environments (ISO 27001, HIPAA, or local equivalent), with optional on-prem deployment.

Yes. Outputs are referenceable and traceable, designed to support—not replace—researcher judgement.

Minimal input if cloud-based. We handle integrations with tools like REDCap, OpenClinica, and LabArchives or work with your data leads.

Yes. The system enables semantic linking and querying across otherwise disconnected datasets.

Outputs include a summary, plain-English version, and technical annex—editable before distribution.

No. It shifts them to higher-value tasks like QC and training. Most sites reduce burnout and backlog, not roles.

Yes. The tools support multi-site access, project-specific governance, and role-based permissions.

Usually 6 to 8 weeks, depending on level of integration. Faster for standard deployments.

A sponsor from research ops and a technical lead from IT or data. We supply a delivery manager.

Minimal. Most features integrate with existing systems. Admin and data teams get tailored onboarding.

You can edit templates or workflows without needing new code. Changes apply automatically to future outputs.

We track time saved, faster ethics cycles, reduced errors, and researcher satisfaction through custom dashboards.